ScholarGate
Βοηθός

Σύγκριση μεθόδων

Εξετάστε τις επιλεγμένες μεθόδους δίπλα-δίπλα· οι γραμμές που διαφέρουν επισημαίνονται.

Χωρική Διπλά Εύρωστη Εκτίμηση×Αντιστοίχιση Βαθμολογίας Προδιάθεσης×
ΠεδίοΑιτιακή ΣυμπερασματολογίαΕρευνητική Στατιστική
ΟικογένειαRegression modelProcess / pipeline
Έτος προέλευσης2010s–2020s1983
ΔημιουργόςExtension of Robins, Rotnitzky & Zhao (1994) doubly robust framework to spatial settings; developed in spatial epidemiology and econometrics literaturePaul Rosenbaum and Donald Rubin
ΤύποςSemiparametric causal estimatorMethod
Θεμελιώδης πηγήPapadogeorgou, G., Mealli, F., & Zigler, C. M. (2019). Causal inference with interfering units for cluster and population level treatment allocation programs. Biometrics, 75(3), 778-787. DOI ↗Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. DOI ↗
Εναλλακτικές ονομασίεςSpatial DR, Spatial AIPW, Spatial augmented IPW, Doubly robust spatial causal estimationPSM, propensity score weighting, covariate balance
Συναφείς53
ΣύνοψηSpatial doubly robust estimation is a semiparametric causal inference method that combines propensity score weighting with outcome regression modeling — providing protection against misspecification of either component — while explicitly accounting for spatial autocorrelation among units. It extends the classical augmented inverse probability weighting (AIPW) estimator to settings where treatment assignment and outcomes are geographically clustered or spatially dependent.Propensity score matching (PSM) is a method for reducing confounding bias in observational studies by balancing baseline characteristics between treatment groups, simulating randomization. Developed by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983), it estimates the probability of receiving treatment given observed covariates, then matches or weights treated and control individuals with similar treatment probabilities. Widely used in medicine, epidemiology, and policy evaluation when randomized trials are infeasible or unethical, enabling estimation of treatment effects while controlling for selection bias.
ScholarGateΣύνολο δεδομένων
  1. v1
  2. 2 Πηγές
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Πηγές
  3. PUBLISHED

Μετάβαση στην αναζήτηση Λήψη διαφανειών

ScholarGateΣύγκριση μεθόδων: Spatial Doubly Robust Estimation · Propensity Score Matching. Ανακτήθηκε στις 2026-06-17 από https://scholargate.app/el/compare