ScholarGate
Βοηθός

Σύγκριση μεθόδων

Εξετάστε τις επιλεγμένες μεθόδους δίπλα-δίπλα· οι γραμμές που διαφέρουν επισημαίνονται.

Σύντομη Νομολογική Εγκυρότητα×Εγκυρότητα Δομής (Construct Validity)×
ΠεδίοΨυχομετρίαΨυχομετρία
ΟικογένειαLatent structureLatent structure
Έτος προέλευσης1955 (concept); 2000 (short-form context)1955
ΔημιουργόςCronbach & Meehl (nomological network concept); Smith et al. for short-form applicationLee J. Cronbach & Paul E. Meehl
ΤύποςValidity assessment techniqueValidity evaluation framework
Θεμελιώδης πηγήCronbach, L. J. & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗Cronbach, L. J. & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗
Εναλλακτικές ονομασίεςnomological validity of abbreviated scales, short-scale construct validity, nomological network validity, abbreviated form external validityconstruct validation, factorial validity, nomological validity evidence, validity of interpretation
Συναφείς46
ΣύνοψηShort form nomological validity examines whether an abbreviated version of a psychological scale preserves the pattern of theoretically expected correlations with conceptually related and unrelated constructs. It is a cornerstone step in justifying the use of a shortened instrument in research and applied settings.Construct validity is the degree to which a test or scale actually measures the theoretical construct it is intended to measure. Introduced by Cronbach and Meehl in 1955, it is the central validity concern in psychological and educational measurement, evaluated by accumulating multiple lines of empirical and logical evidence rather than by any single statistical test.
ScholarGateΣύνολο δεδομένων
  1. v1
  2. 2 Πηγές
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Πηγές
  3. PUBLISHED

Μετάβαση στην αναζήτηση Λήψη διαφανειών

ScholarGateΣύγκριση μεθόδων: Short form nomological validity · Construct Validity. Ανακτήθηκε στις 2026-06-17 από https://scholargate.app/el/compare