ScholarGate
Βοηθός

Σύγκριση μεθόδων

Εξετάστε τις επιλεγμένες μεθόδους δίπλα-δίπλα· οι γραμμές που διαφέρουν επισημαίνονται.

Εγκυρότητα περιεχομένου σύντομης μορφής×Συγκλίνουσα Εγκυρότητα×
ΠεδίοΨυχομετρίαΨυχομετρία
ΟικογένειαLatent structureLatent structure
Έτος προέλευσης1995–20001959
ΔημιουργόςMessick (validity framework); Smith et al. (short-form standards)Donald T. Campbell & Donald W. Fiske
ΤύποςValidity evaluationValidity evidence / construct validation
Θεμελιώδης πηγήSmith, G. T., McCarthy, D. M., & Anderson, K. G. (2000). On the sins of short-form development. Psychological Assessment, 12(1), 102–111. DOI ↗Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. DOI ↗
Εναλλακτικές ονομασίεςabbreviated scale content validity, short-scale content coverage, brief form content validity, content validity for short formsconvergent construct validity, convergence validity, AVE-based convergent validity
Συναφείς64
ΣύνοψηShort-form content validity evaluates whether items retained in an abbreviated scale still adequately represent every substantive facet of the construct measured by the original full-length instrument. It ensures that shortening a scale does not hollow out the conceptual domain it was designed to cover.Convergent validity is the degree to which multiple indicators that are theoretically expected to measure the same construct actually correlate with one another. It is one of the two complementary forms of construct validity identified by Campbell and Fiske (1959) and is now routinely assessed via factor loadings and the Average Variance Extracted (AVE) statistic in SEM-based scale validation.
ScholarGateΣύνολο δεδομένων
  1. v1
  2. 2 Πηγές
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Πηγές
  3. PUBLISHED

Μετάβαση στην αναζήτηση Λήψη διαφανειών

ScholarGateΣύγκριση μεθόδων: Short form content validity · Convergent Validity. Ανακτήθηκε στις 2026-06-17 από https://scholargate.app/el/compare