ScholarGate
Βοηθός

Σύγκριση μεθόδων

Εξετάστε τις επιλεγμένες μεθόδους δίπλα-δίπλα· οι γραμμές που διαφέρουν επισημαίνονται.

Ανθεκτική Αντιπαραδειγματική Αξιολόγηση Επιπτώσεων×Αντιστοίχιση Βαθμολογίας Προδιάθεσης×
ΠεδίοΑιτιακή ΣυμπερασματολογίαΕρευνητική Στατιστική
ΟικογένειαRegression modelProcess / pipeline
Έτος προέλευσης2010s1983
ΔημιουργόςEuropean Commission evaluation community; Pellegrini, Ferrara and colleaguesPaul Rosenbaum and Donald Rubin
ΤύποςRobustness-validated causal evaluationMethod
Θεμελιώδης πηγήBia, M., Flores, C. A., Flores-Lagunes, A., & Mattei, A. (2014). A Stata package for the application of semiparametric estimators of dose–response functions. Stata Journal, 14(3), 580–604. link ↗Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. DOI ↗
Εναλλακτικές ονομασίεςRobust CIE, Sensitivity-checked CIE, Multi-method counterfactual evaluation, Robustness-validated impact evaluationPSM, propensity score weighting, covariate balance
Συναφείς53
ΣύνοψηRobust Counterfactual Impact Evaluation (Robust CIE) strengthens causal impact estimates by combining multiple quasi-experimental estimators, placebo tests, and formal sensitivity analyses. Rather than relying on a single method, it cross-validates findings across approaches — such as matching, difference-in-differences, and regression discontinuity — to ensure that conclusions do not depend on any single methodological choice.Propensity score matching (PSM) is a method for reducing confounding bias in observational studies by balancing baseline characteristics between treatment groups, simulating randomization. Developed by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983), it estimates the probability of receiving treatment given observed covariates, then matches or weights treated and control individuals with similar treatment probabilities. Widely used in medicine, epidemiology, and policy evaluation when randomized trials are infeasible or unethical, enabling estimation of treatment effects while controlling for selection bias.
ScholarGateΣύνολο δεδομένων
  1. v1
  2. 2 Πηγές
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Πηγές
  3. PUBLISHED

Μετάβαση στην αναζήτηση Λήψη διαφανειών

ScholarGateΣύγκριση μεθόδων: Robust Counterfactual Impact Evaluation · Propensity Score Matching. Ανακτήθηκε στις 2026-06-19 από https://scholargate.app/el/compare