ScholarGate
Βοηθός

Σύγκριση μεθόδων

Εξετάστε τις επιλεγμένες μεθόδους δίπλα-δίπλα· οι γραμμές που διαφέρουν επισημαίνονται.

Πραγματικός Σχεδιασμός Πειραμάτων Μοναδικής Υποκειμενικής Ομάδας×Εκλεκτική Τυχαιοποιημένη Ελεγχόμενη Δοκιμή×
ΠεδίοΠειραματικός ΣχεδιασμόςΠειραματικός Σχεδιασμός
ΟικογένειαProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Έτος προέλευσης1960s–1970s (SSED roots); pragmatic framing prominent from 1990s onward1967
ΔημιουργόςApplied behavior analysis tradition (Sidman, Baer, Wolf, Risley); pragmatic adaptation from clinical researchDaniel Schwartz and Joseph Lellouch
ΤύποςSingle-case experimental design variantExperimental design — pragmatic trial
Θεμελιώδης πηγήKazdin, A. E. (2011). Single-Case Research Designs: Methods for Clinical and Applied Settings (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978-0195341881Schwartz, D., & Lellouch, J. (1967). Explanatory and pragmatic attitudes in therapeutical trials. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 20(8), 637–648. DOI ↗
Εναλλακτικές ονομασίεςpragmatic SSED, pragmatic N-of-1 design, real-world single-case design, applied single-subject experimental designpRCT, pragmatic trial, practical clinical trial, real-world RCT
Συναφείς64
ΣύνοψηPragmatic single-subject experimental design applies the logic of single-case experimentation — repeated measurement, baseline comparison, and phase manipulation — within real-world practice settings rather than controlled laboratories. It allows practitioners and clinicians to rigorously evaluate interventions for individual participants without requiring large samples, making it especially valuable in applied, clinical, and educational contexts where heterogeneity across individuals is high.A pragmatic randomized controlled trial (pRCT) tests whether an intervention works under ordinary, real-world conditions — broad eligibility, flexible delivery, and routine care settings. Participants are still randomly assigned to treatment or control, preserving causal inference, but the study is designed to reflect the diversity and variability of actual practice rather than the ideal conditions of an explanatory trial. The defining framework is the PRECIS-2 tool, which maps any RCT along nine pragmatic-to-explanatory dimensions.
ScholarGateΣύνολο δεδομένων
  1. v1
  2. 2 Πηγές
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Πηγές
  3. PUBLISHED

Μετάβαση στην αναζήτηση Λήψη διαφανειών

ScholarGateΣύγκριση μεθόδων: Pragmatic Single-Subject Experimental Design · Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial. Ανακτήθηκε στις 2026-06-19 από https://scholargate.app/el/compare