ScholarGate
Βοηθός

Σύγκριση μεθόδων

Εξετάστε τις επιλεγμένες μεθόδους δίπλα-δίπλα· οι γραμμές που διαφέρουν επισημαίνονται.

Αξιολόγηση Πολιτικής με Αντιστοίχιση Βαθμολογίας Προδιάθεσης×Αντιστοίχιση Βαθμολογίας Προδιάθεσης×
ΠεδίοΑιτιακή ΣυμπερασματολογίαΕρευνητική Στατιστική
ΟικογένειαRegression modelProcess / pipeline
Έτος προέλευσης1983; policy evaluation adaptation 19971983
ΔημιουργόςRosenbaum & Rubin (1983); Heckman, Ichimura & Todd (1997) for program/policy evaluation applicationPaul Rosenbaum and Donald Rubin
ΤύποςQuasi-experimental matching estimatorMethod
Θεμελιώδης πηγήRosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55. DOI ↗Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. DOI ↗
Εναλλακτικές ονομασίεςPSM policy evaluation, policy PSM, propensity matching for program evaluation, PSM treatment evaluationPSM, propensity score weighting, covariate balance
Συναφείς63
ΣύνοψηPolicy evaluation propensity score matching applies the propensity score framework — originally developed by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983) and operationalized for program evaluation by Heckman et al. (1997) — to estimate the causal effect of a policy intervention. It constructs a credible comparison group from non-participants by matching them to participants on their estimated probability of receiving the treatment, enabling unbiased effect estimation without random assignment.Propensity score matching (PSM) is a method for reducing confounding bias in observational studies by balancing baseline characteristics between treatment groups, simulating randomization. Developed by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983), it estimates the probability of receiving treatment given observed covariates, then matches or weights treated and control individuals with similar treatment probabilities. Widely used in medicine, epidemiology, and policy evaluation when randomized trials are infeasible or unethical, enabling estimation of treatment effects while controlling for selection bias.
ScholarGateΣύνολο δεδομένων
  1. v1
  2. 2 Πηγές
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Πηγές
  3. PUBLISHED

Μετάβαση στην αναζήτηση Λήψη διαφανειών

ScholarGateΣύγκριση μεθόδων: Policy Evaluation Propensity Score Matching · Propensity Score Matching. Ανακτήθηκε στις 2026-06-19 από https://scholargate.app/el/compare