Σύγκριση μεθόδων
Εξετάστε τις επιλεγμένες μεθόδους δίπλα-δίπλα· οι γραμμές που διαφέρουν επισημαίνονται.
| Δοκιμή Πλαστοπ (Placebo Test) Δεδομένων Πάνελ× | Ανάλυση Ευαισθησίας για Αιτιότητα× | |
|---|---|---|
| Πεδίο | Αιτιακή Συμπερασματολογία | Αιτιακή Συμπερασματολογία |
| Οικογένεια | Regression model | Regression model |
| Έτος προέλευσης≠ | 2004-2010 | 1983–2002 |
| Δημιουργός≠ | Bertrand, Duflo & Mullainathan; Abadie, Diamond & Hainmueller | Paul R. Rosenbaum (hidden-bias framework); extended by Cinelli & Hazlett (omitted-variable approach) |
| Τύπος≠ | Falsification / validation test | Diagnostic / robustness check |
| Θεμελιώδης πηγή≠ | Bertrand, M., Duflo, E., & Mullainathan, S. (2004). How Much Should We Trust Differences-in-Differences Estimates? Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119(1), 249-275. DOI ↗ | Rosenbaum, P. R. (2002). Observational Studies (2nd ed.). Springer. ISBN: 978-0387989679 |
| Εναλλακτικές ονομασίες | placebo regression test, falsification test, pseudo-treatment test, in-time placebo | sensitivity analysis, hidden-bias sensitivity analysis, Rosenbaum sensitivity analysis, omitted-variable sensitivity |
| Συναφείς | 4 | 4 |
| Σύνοψη≠ | A panel data placebo test is a falsification procedure used to assess the credibility of causal estimates in quasi-experimental panel designs. By applying the same estimation strategy to a period, group, or outcome where no true effect should exist, researchers verify that the observed treatment effect is not merely an artifact of model specification, coincidental trends, or data patterns unrelated to the intervention. | Sensitivity analysis for causality assesses how robust a causal conclusion is to unobserved confounding. Rather than assuming all confounders are controlled, it asks: how strong would an unmeasured variable need to be to overturn the estimated effect? It is an indispensable robustness check after any quasi-experimental or observational causal analysis. |
| ScholarGateΣύνολο δεδομένων ↗ |
|
|