ScholarGate
Βοηθός

Σύγκριση μεθόδων

Εξετάστε τις επιλεγμένες μεθόδους δίπλα-δίπλα· οι γραμμές που διαφέρουν επισημαίνονται.

Ονομαστική Νομολογική Εγκυρότητα×Διακριτική Εγκυρότητα Διατεταγμένων Δεδομένων×
ΠεδίοΨυχομετρίαΨυχομετρία
ΟικογένειαLatent structureLatent structure
Έτος προέλευσης1955 (concept); ordinal application 1990s–present1959 (concept); 2000s–2010s (ordinal adaptations)
ΔημιουργόςCronbach & Meehl (nomological network concept); ordinal extension in modern psychometricsCampbell & Fiske (discriminant validity concept); adapted for ordinal data by subsequent psychometricians
ΤύποςValidity assessmentValidity assessment
Θεμελιώδης πηγήCronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. DOI ↗
Εναλλακτικές ονομασίεςnomological validity for ordinal data, ordinal nomological network, construct network validity (ordinal), ordinal criterion-related validitydiscriminant validity for ordinal data, polychoric discriminant validity, ordinal HTMT, ordinal AVE-based discriminant validity
Συναφείς56
ΣύνοψηOrdinal nomological validity examines whether a construct measured with ordinal items (e.g., Likert-type scales) behaves in theoretically predicted ways within a nomological network — a web of expected relationships with other constructs and criteria — using methods suited to ordinal data rather than assuming continuous measurement.Ordinal discriminant validity assesses whether a latent construct measured by ordinal (Likert-type) items is empirically distinct from other constructs in the same instrument. It applies polychoric correlations and ordinal-appropriate factor loadings to standard discriminant validity criteria such as the Fornell-Larcker rule and the Heterotrait-Monotrait ratio (HTMT), ensuring that validity conclusions are not distorted by the non-continuous nature of ordered-response data.
ScholarGateΣύνολο δεδομένων
  1. v1
  2. 2 Πηγές
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Πηγές
  3. PUBLISHED

Μετάβαση στην αναζήτηση Λήψη διαφανειών

ScholarGateΣύγκριση μεθόδων: Ordinal Nomological Validity · Ordinal Discriminant Validity. Ανακτήθηκε στις 2026-06-18 από https://scholargate.app/el/compare