ScholarGate
Βοηθός

Σύγκριση μεθόδων

Εξετάστε τις επιλεγμένες μεθόδους δίπλα-δίπλα· οι γραμμές που διαφέρουν επισημαίνονται.

Network Autocorrelation Model×MRQAP Network Regression×
ΠεδίοSociologySociology
ΟικογένειαRegression modelRegression model
Έτος προέλευσης1980 (spatial/network models); 2002 (weight matrix)1988 (MRQAP); 2007 (double-semipartialing test)
ΔημιουργόςPatrick Doreian; Roger Leenders (weight-matrix synthesis)David Krackhardt; David Dekker, David Krackhardt & Tom Snijders
ΤύποςRegression with an autoregressive term on a network weight matrixPermutation-based multiple regression for dyadic (matrix) outcomes
Θεμελιώδης πηγήLeenders, R. Th. A. J. (2002). Modeling social influence through network autocorrelation: Constructing the weight matrix. Social Networks, 24(1), 21–47. DOI ↗Krackhardt, D. (1988). Predicting with networks: Nonparametric multiple regression analysis of dyadic data. Social Networks, 10(4), 359–381. DOI ↗
Εναλλακτικές ονομασίεςnetwork effects model, social influence model, network disturbances model, autoregressive network modelMRQAP, multiple regression QAP, Dekker double-semipartialing, QAP regression
Συναφείς44
ΣύνοψηThe network autocorrelation model adapts spatial-econometric regression to social networks to estimate peer influence: it explains an actor's outcome — an attitude, behavior, or performance — as a function of their own covariates plus a weighted average of their network partners' outcomes. The autocorrelation parameter ρ captures the strength of social influence, and the network weight matrix W encodes who influences whom and how strongly.Multiple regression quadratic assignment procedure (MRQAP) extends QAP to the regression setting: it predicts a dependent relational matrix from several independent relational matrices on the same actors — for example, modeling who collaborates with whom as a function of who is co-located, who shares a department, and who has prior friendship. Coefficients are estimated by ordinary least squares on the vectorized matrices, but significance is assessed by permutation, because dyadic dependence invalidates the standard regression standard errors.
ScholarGateΣύνολο δεδομένων
  1. v1
  2. 2 Πηγές
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Πηγές
  3. PUBLISHED

Μετάβαση στην αναζήτηση Λήψη διαφανειών

ScholarGateΣύγκριση μεθόδων: Network Autocorrelation Model · MRQAP Network Regression. Ανακτήθηκε στις 2026-06-24 από https://scholargate.app/el/compare