Σύγκριση μεθόδων
Εξετάστε τις επιλεγμένες μεθόδους δίπλα-δίπλα· οι γραμμές που διαφέρουν επισημαίνονται.
| Ανάλυση Ανταγωνιστικών Κινδύνων με Ζευγοποίηση× | Αντίστροφη Πιθανότητα Στάθμισης Θεραπείας (IPW / IPTW)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Πεδίο≠ | Επιδημιολογία | Αιτιακή Συμπερασματολογία |
| Οικογένεια≠ | Process / pipeline | Regression model |
| Έτος προέλευσης≠ | 1999 (Fine-Gray model); extended to matched designs ~2010s | 2000 |
| Δημιουργός≠ | Fine & Gray (subdistribution hazard model); Austin, Lee & Fine (matched competing risks framework) | Robins, Hernán & Brumback |
| Τύπος≠ | Observational survival analysis with matching and competing events | Causal inference weighting estimator |
| Θεμελιώδης πηγή≠ | Fine, J. P., & Gray, R. J. (1999). A proportional hazards model for the subdistribution of a competing risk. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94(446), 496–509. DOI ↗ | Robins, J. M., Hernán, M. A., & Brumback, B. (2000). Marginal Structural Models and Causal Inference in Epidemiology. Epidemiology, 11(5), 550-560. DOI ↗ |
| Εναλλακτικές ονομασίες≠ | matched Fine-Gray analysis, propensity-matched competing risks, matched cause-specific hazard analysis, matched subdistribution hazard analysis | IPW, IPTW, inverse probability of treatment weighting, marginal structural model weighting |
| Συναφείς≠ | 4 | 5 |
| Σύνοψη≠ | Matched competing risks analysis combines subject-level matching (e.g., propensity-score matching) with competing risks survival methods to estimate the cause-specific or subdistribution hazard of an event of interest while accounting for competing events that preclude the occurrence of that event. It is widely used in clinical and epidemiological observational studies where patients may die from causes other than the primary outcome of interest, and where treatment groups differ on baseline confounders. | Inverse Probability Weighting is a causal-inference method that assigns each observation a weight equal to the inverse of its probability of receiving the treatment it actually received. Introduced by Robins, Hernán and Brumback (2000) for marginal structural models, it builds a pseudo-population in which treatment is independent of measured confounders, balancing selection bias. |
| ScholarGateΣύνολο δεδομένων ↗ |
|
|