ScholarGate
Βοηθός

Σύγκριση μεθόδων

Εξετάστε τις επιλεγμένες μεθόδους δίπλα-δίπλα· οι γραμμές που διαφέρουν επισημαίνονται.

Συνέντευξη σε Βάθος με Διαχρονική Προσέγγιση×Semi-Structured Interview×
ΠεδίοΜεθοδολογία ΕπισκοπήσεωνΠοιοτικές Μέθοδοι
ΟικογένειαProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Έτος προέλευσης1990s–2000s (as a formalised qualitative method)1946 (Merton & Kendall); codified as a standard method through the 1980s–1990s
ΔημιουργόςRooted in qualitative longitudinal research traditions; systematised by Johnny SaldanaRobert K. Merton and Patricia Kendall (focused interview, 1946); further systematised by Steinar Kvale
ΤύποςQualitative longitudinal data collection techniqueQualitative research method
Θεμελιώδης πηγήSaldana, J. (2003). Longitudinal Qualitative Research: Analyzing Change Through Time. AltaMira Press. ISBN: 978-0759103917Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). InterViews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing (2nd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-0761925422
Εναλλακτικές ονομασίεςrepeated in-depth interview, longitudinal qualitative interview, panel qualitative interview, longitudinal IDIguided interview, semi-standardized interview, focused interview, SSI
Συναφείς56
ΣύνοψηLongitudinal in-depth interviewing is a qualitative data collection technique in which the same participants are interviewed in depth on multiple occasions across a defined time span. By revisiting the same people over weeks, months, or years, researchers can trace how experiences, identities, attitudes, and meanings change — something a single interview cannot reveal. It is widely used in life-course research, health studies, education, and social policy.The semi-structured interview is a qualitative data-collection method in which the researcher prepares a set of key questions or topic areas in advance but remains free to probe, follow up, and reorder as the conversation evolves. Unlike structured interviews — which fix every question and sequence — or unstructured interviews — which are entirely open — the semi-structured format balances comparability across participants with the flexibility needed to capture the depth and nuance of individual perspectives. It is the most widely used interview format in social science, health, and education research.
ScholarGateΣύνολο δεδομένων
  1. v1
  2. 2 Πηγές
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Πηγές
  3. PUBLISHED

Μετάβαση στην αναζήτηση Λήψη διαφανειών

ScholarGateΣύγκριση μεθόδων: Longitudinal In-depth Interview · Semi-Structured Interview. Ανακτήθηκε στις 2026-06-17 από https://scholargate.app/el/compare