ScholarGate
Βοηθός

Σύγκριση μεθόδων

Εξετάστε τις επιλεγμένες μεθόδους δίπλα-δίπλα· οι γραμμές που διαφέρουν επισημαίνονται.

Lived Religion Ethnography×Religious Vitality Index×
ΠεδίοSociology Of ReligionSociology Of Religion
ΟικογένειαProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Έτος προέλευσης20081994
ΔημιουργόςMeredith B. McGuire (synthesis); Robert OrsiLaurence R. Iannaccone
ΤύποςEthnographic fieldwork on everyday religious practiceIndex/model of religious group strength via strictness
Θεμελιώδης πηγήMcGuire, M. B. (2008). Lived Religion: Faith and Practice in Everyday Life. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN: 9780195368338Iannaccone, L. R. (1994). Why Strict Churches Are Strong. American Journal of Sociology, 99(5), 1180-1211. DOI ↗
Εναλλακτικές ονομασίεςEveryday Religion Ethnography, Lived Religion Fieldwork, Religion-as-Practiced Ethnography, Vernacular Religion FieldworkChurch Strength Index, Strictness-Vitality Measure, Religious Group Strength Model, Free-Rider Vitality Index
Συναφείς33
ΣύνοψηLived religion ethnography studies religion as people actually practice it in everyday life rather than as official doctrine, institutional membership, or survey-reported belief. Synthesized by Meredith McGuire in Lived Religion: Faith and Practice in Everyday Life (2008) and shaped by historians such as Robert Orsi, the approach turns attention from what churches teach and what censuses count to what individuals do - the prayers, objects, rituals, healing practices, and improvised devotions that fill ordinary days and often cut across or ignore official boundaries. Through participant observation and in-depth interviews, the ethnographer documents this embodied, material, and frequently idiosyncratic religion, revealing a far messier and more creative religious life than membership statistics or doctrinal statements suggest.The religious vitality index operationalizes Laurence Iannaccone's celebrated argument, in his 1994 American Journal of Sociology article 'Why Strict Churches Are Strong,' that demanding religious groups are often the most vital. The seeming paradox dissolves once religion is viewed as a collective good vulnerable to free-riding: if members can enjoy the fellowship, enthusiasm, and mutual support of a congregation while contributing little, average commitment erodes and the group weakens. Strictness - costly, distinctive demands such as dress codes, time obligations, and behavioral prohibitions - works as a screening device that drives out the half-hearted and raises the average commitment of those who remain. The vitality index therefore models a group's strength as a function of its strictness, its members' participation, and its capacity to retain and mobilize committed adherents.
ScholarGateΣύνολο δεδομένων
  1. v1
  2. 1 Πηγές
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Πηγές
  3. PUBLISHED

Μετάβαση στην αναζήτηση Λήψη διαφανειών

ScholarGateΣύγκριση μεθόδων: Lived Religion Ethnography · Religious Vitality Index. Ανακτήθηκε στις 2026-06-25 από https://scholargate.app/el/compare