ScholarGate
Βοηθός

Σύγκριση μεθόδων

Εξετάστε τις επιλεγμένες μεθόδους δίπλα-δίπλα· οι γραμμές που διαφέρουν επισημαίνονται.

Lifeline Interdependency Analysis×Post-Disaster Needs Assessment×
ΠεδίοDisaster StudiesDisaster Studies
ΟικογένειαProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Έτος προέλευσης20012008
ΔημιουργόςSteven M. Rinaldi, James P. Peerenboom & Terrence K. KellyEuropean Union, World Bank (GFDRR) & United Nations Development Group
ΤύποςNetwork model of coupled critical-infrastructure systems and cascading failureHarmonized post-event assessment pipeline for damage, loss, and recovery needs
Θεμελιώδης πηγήRinaldi, S. M., Peerenboom, J. P., & Kelly, T. K. (2001). Identifying, understanding, and analyzing critical infrastructure interdependencies. IEEE Control Systems Magazine, 21(6), 11-25. DOI ↗GFDRR, European Union, United Nations Development Group (2013). Post-Disaster Needs Assessments Guidelines, Volume A. Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and Recovery, World Bank. link ↗
Εναλλακτικές ονομασίεςCritical Infrastructure Interdependency Analysis, Infrastructure Interdependency Modeling, Lifeline Network AnalysisPDNA, Damage, Loss and Needs Assessment, Post-Disaster Damage and Loss Assessment
Συναφείς33
ΣύνοψηLifeline interdependency analysis studies how critical infrastructure systems — power, water, natural gas, telecommunications, and transportation — depend on one another, so that a disaster striking one can cascade into others. The foundational framework, set out by Steven Rinaldi, James Peerenboom, and Terrence Kelly in 2001, classifies the couplings among infrastructures into physical, cyber, geographic, and logical interdependencies and characterizes how disruptions propagate across them. Modeled as coupled networks, the lifelines and their dependency links allow analysts to simulate cascading failure: a power outage stops water pumping and telecommunications, transport disruption delays restoration, and feedbacks amplify the impact. The analysis estimates the system-wide consequences of disruptions and informs restoration sequencing, making it central to understanding why disasters disable far more than the directly damaged components and to planning resilient, recoverable infrastructure.The Post-Disaster Needs Assessment (PDNA) is a harmonized, government-led methodology for quantifying the effects of a disaster and costing a recovery program. Agreed in 2008 by the European Union, the World Bank (through GFDRR), and the United Nations Development Group, and codified in the PDNA Guidelines, it fuses two traditions: the ECLAC damage-and-loss accounting (DaLA), which values destroyed assets and the economic flows foregone during recovery, and a human-and-recovery-needs assessment, which captures impacts on people's lives, livelihoods, and access to services. Conducted sector by sector against a pre-disaster baseline, a PDNA produces a single consolidated picture of total disaster effects and feeds a costed Recovery Framework that increasingly embeds build-back-better resilience, giving governments and donors a common basis for mobilizing and prioritizing recovery resources.
ScholarGateΣύνολο δεδομένων
  1. v1
  2. 2 Πηγές
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Πηγές
  3. PUBLISHED

Μετάβαση στην αναζήτηση Λήψη διαφανειών

ScholarGateΣύγκριση μεθόδων: Lifeline Interdependency Analysis · Post-Disaster Needs Assessment. Ανακτήθηκε στις 2026-06-24 από https://scholargate.app/el/compare