Σύγκριση μεθόδων

	Ισοκινητική Δυναμομέτρηση	Προφίλ Δύναμης-Ταχύτητας
Πεδίο	Επιστήμη του Αθλητισμού	Επιστήμη του Αθλητισμού
Οικογένεια	Hypothesis test	Hypothesis test
Έτος προέλευσης	1967	2007
Δημιουργός	Henry Hislop	Biomechanics Research Group
Τύπος	constant-velocity testing	mechanical profiling
Θεμελιώδης πηγή	Hislop, H. J., & Perrine, J. J. (1967). The isokinetic concept of exercise. Physical Therapy, 47(2), 114-117.	Bampouras, T. M., Comyns, T. M., Daly, D. J., & Deighan, M. A. (2007). Comparison of the Wingate test and an isokinetic anaerobic test in recreationally active children. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 41(12), 822-825.
Εναλλακτικές ονομασίες	isokinetic testing, constant velocity testing, dynamometric testing	FVP, force-velocity curve, power profile, strength-speed balance
Συναφείς	5	5
Σύνοψη	Isokinetic dynamometry measures muscular strength and power production during movement at a constant, preset velocity. Pioneered by Hislop and Perrine (1967), isokinetic testing constrains limb velocity to a fixed speed (e.g., 60°/s or 120°/s), while the dynamometer adjusts resistance to match the subject's force production at each instant, accommodating all variations in force throughout the range of motion. This approach provides comprehensive strength profiling across a full joint range and allows comparison of concentric and eccentric contractions. Isokinetic testing is widely used in clinical rehabilitation, sports medicine, and research due to its objectivity and standardization.	The force-velocity profile characterizes an individual's mechanical properties across the force-velocity spectrum, revealing whether strength advantage lies in maximal force production or high-velocity power output. Formalized by Samozino and colleagues (2012), the FVP is derived from multiple load-velocity measurements (typically sprint starts, jumps, or push-off movements at various resistances) and mathematically modeled as a linear inverse relationship between force and velocity, anchored by maximal power. Athletes differ markedly in their FVP: some excel at moving heavy loads slowly (force-dominant), while others excel at moving light loads fast (velocity-dominant). Profiling identifies these phenotypes and informs targeted training interventions.