Σύγκριση μεθόδων
Εξετάστε τις επιλεγμένες μεθόδους δίπλα-δίπλα· οι γραμμές που διαφέρουν επισημαίνονται.
| Ερμηνευτική Πολλαπλή Μελέτη Περίπτωσης× | Ερμηνευτική Θεμελιωμένη Θεωρία× | |
|---|---|---|
| Πεδίο | Ποιοτικές Μέθοδοι | Ποιοτικές Μέθοδοι |
| Οικογένεια | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Έτος προέλευσης≠ | 1980s–1990s (Yin 1984; Stake 1995, 2006) | 1967 (foundational); interpretivist articulation ~2000–2006 |
| Δημιουργός≠ | Robert K. Yin (multiple case study design); Robert E. Stake (collective/interpretive case study) | Kathy Charmaz (interpretivist/constructivist strand); foundational grounded theory by Glaser & Strauss |
| Τύπος≠ | Qualitative research design | Qualitative research methodology |
| Θεμελιώδης πηγή≠ | Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1506336169 | Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. Sage. ISBN: 978-0761973539 |
| Εναλλακτικές ονομασίες | multi-site interpretive case study, collective case study, interpretive multi-case design, constructivist multiple case study | interpretivist grounded theory, constructivist grounded theory, IGT, grounded theory — interpretivist strand |
| Συναφείς≠ | 5 | 6 |
| Σύνοψη≠ | Interpretive multiple case study is a qualitative research design in which the researcher studies two or more bounded cases in depth, using an interpretivist stance to understand how participants construct meaning within each setting. Rather than seeking law-like generalizations, it aims to generate rich, context-sensitive understanding that is then compared across cases to reveal patterns, contrasts, and theoretical insights. | Interpretive grounded theory is a qualitative methodology that builds substantive theory inductively from data while working from an interpretivist epistemological stance. Developed most fully by Kathy Charmaz, it holds that researcher and participant co-construct meaning, that categories are created rather than discovered, and that the resulting theory is one plausible account among others rather than an objective rendering of social reality. |
| ScholarGateΣύνολο δεδομένων ↗ |
|
|