ScholarGate
Βοηθός

Σύγκριση μεθόδων

Εξετάστε τις επιλεγμένες μεθόδους δίπλα-δίπλα· οι γραμμές που διαφέρουν επισημαίνονται.

Έρευνα Ελέγχου Υποθέσεων×Έρευνα Αιτιώδους-Συγκριτικής Σχεδίασης×
ΠεδίοΕρευνητικός ΣχεδιασμόςΕρευνητικός Σχεδιασμός
ΟικογένειαProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Έτος προέλευσηςEarly 20th century (Fisher 1925; Neyman–Pearson 1933)1964
ΔημιουργόςKarl Pearson, Ronald A. Fisher, Jerzy Neyman, Egon PearsonFred N. Kerlinger
ΤύποςQuantitative confirmatory research designNon-experimental quantitative research design
Θεμελιώδης πηγήKerlinger, F. N., & Lee, H. B. (1986). Foundations of Behavioral Research (3rd ed.). Holt, Rinehart and Winston. ISBN: 978-0030417603Kerlinger, F. N. (1964). Foundations of Behavioral Research. Holt, Rinehart and Winston. link ↗
Εναλλακτικές ονομασίεςhypothetico-deductive research, confirmatory quantitative research, null hypothesis significance testing, NHST designex post facto research, causal-comparative design, retrospective causal study, CCR
Συναφείς43
ΣύνοψηHypothesis testing research is a quantitative design in which the investigator derives one or more explicit, falsifiable propositions from theory, translates them into a null hypothesis (H0) and an alternative hypothesis (H1), collects empirical data, and then applies an inferential statistical test to decide whether the evidence is sufficient to reject H0. The approach is the dominant paradigm for confirmatory science across the social, behavioral, health, and natural sciences.Causal-comparative research is a non-experimental quantitative design in which the researcher compares two or more groups that already differ on an independent variable — one that was not manipulated — to investigate possible causes or consequences of that difference. Because group membership is pre-existing rather than randomly assigned, the design can suggest causal relationships but cannot establish them with the certainty of a true experiment. It is widely used in education, psychology, and social sciences when experimental manipulation is impractical or unethical.
ScholarGateΣύνολο δεδομένων
  1. v1
  2. 2 Πηγές
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Πηγές
  3. PUBLISHED

Μετάβαση στην αναζήτηση Λήψη διαφανειών

ScholarGateΣύγκριση μεθόδων: Hypothesis Testing Research · Causal-Comparative Research. Ανακτήθηκε στις 2026-06-17 από https://scholargate.app/el/compare