ScholarGate
Βοηθός

Σύγκριση μεθόδων

Εξετάστε τις επιλεγμένες μεθόδους δίπλα-δίπλα· οι γραμμές που διαφέρουν επισημαίνονται.

Αξιολόγηση Συνεχιζόμενης Δραστηριότητας×Αξιολόγηση Εσωτερικού Ελέγχου×
ΠεδίοΛογιστικήΛογιστική
ΟικογένειαMCDMMCDM
Έτος προέλευσης19881992
ΔημιουργόςAmerican Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) and International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB)The Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)
ΤύποςAudit assessment and reporting frameworkComprehensive control evaluation framework
Θεμελιώδης πηγήAmerican Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). (2015). Evaluating Compliance with Going Concern Assumption. AU-C Section 570. AICPA Professional Standards. link ↗The Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). (2013). Internal Control – Integrated Framework. COSO Publications. link ↗
Εναλλακτικές ονομασίεςGoing Concern Analysis, Entity Viability Assessment, Continuity EvaluationCOSO Framework, Control Design Testing, Internal Control Assessment
Συναφείς34
ΣύνοψηGoing Concern Evaluation is an auditor framework for assessing whether the entity being audited will be able to continue operating and meeting its obligations in the foreseeable future (typically, one year from the financial statement date). Required by auditing standards, this assessment examines financial and operational indicators of distress and evaluates management's plans to address concerns, ultimately determining whether financial statements require modification or special disclosure.Internal Control Evaluation is a systematic methodology for assessing the design and effectiveness of an entity's internal control system using the COSO Integrated Framework. Developed by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, this approach evaluates five interrelated components—control environment, risk assessment, control activities, information and communication, and monitoring—to determine whether controls are adequate to prevent and detect errors and fraud.
ScholarGateΣύνολο δεδομένων
  1. v1
  2. 2 Πηγές
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Πηγές
  3. PUBLISHED

Μετάβαση στην αναζήτηση Λήψη διαφανειών

ScholarGateΣύγκριση μεθόδων: Going Concern Evaluation · Internal Control Evaluation. Ανακτήθηκε στις 2026-06-15 από https://scholargate.app/el/compare