Σύγκριση μεθόδων
Εξετάστε τις επιλεγμένες μεθόδους δίπλα-δίπλα· οι γραμμές που διαφέρουν επισημαίνονται.
| Έρευνα Ομάδων Εστίασης× | Μέθοδος Delphi× | |
|---|---|---|
| Πεδίο | Ποιοτικές Μέθοδοι | Ποιοτικές Μέθοδοι |
| Οικογένεια | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Έτος προέλευσης≠ | 1940s (sociological origin); modern applied form from the 1980s–1990s | 1963 |
| Δημιουργός≠ | Robert K. Merton (sociological precursor, 1940s); popularised in applied research by Richard A. Krueger | Norman Dalkey & Olaf Helmer (RAND Corporation) |
| Τύπος≠ | Qualitative data collection method | Structured iterative expert-elicitation process |
| Θεμελιώδης πηγή≠ | Krueger, R.A. & Casey, M.A. (2014). Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research (5th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1483365244 | Dalkey, N. & Helmer, O. (1963). An Experimental Application of the Delphi Method to the Use of Experts. Management Science, 9(3), 458-467. DOI ↗ |
| Εναλλακτικές ονομασίες≠ | focus group discussion, FGD, group interview, Odak Grup Araştırması | Delphi Yöntemi, Delphi technique, expert consensus method |
| Συναφείς≠ | 6 | 5 |
| Σύνοψη≠ | Focus group research is a qualitative data-collection method in which a trained moderator guides structured discussions with homogeneous groups of six to ten participants to explore ideas, attitudes, and perceptions on a defined topic. Developed from sociological roots in the 1940s and systematised for applied research by Krueger and Casey, the method leverages group interaction as a data source — revealing not just what people think, but how they negotiate and articulate views in a social setting. | The Delphi method is a structured, iterative survey technique developed by Norman Dalkey and Olaf Helmer at the RAND Corporation in 1963 for eliciting and converging expert opinion on complex topics where empirical data are unavailable or insufficient. It collects independent judgements from a geographically dispersed expert panel over multiple anonymous rounds, feeding aggregated results back to participants after each round so they can revise their views in light of the group's collective position. |
| ScholarGateΣύνολο δεδομένων ↗ |
|
|