ScholarGate
Βοηθός

Σύγκριση μεθόδων

Εξετάστε τις επιλεγμένες μεθόδους δίπλα-δίπλα· οι γραμμές που διαφέρουν επισημαίνονται.

Field Experiment in Politics×Πειραματική Μελέτη Πεδίου×
ΠεδίοPolitical ScienceΠειραματικός Σχεδιασμός
ΟικογένειαProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Έτος προέλευσης20001920s–1930s (agriculture); 1990s–2000s (social sciences)
ΔημιουργόςGerber & Green (modern political field experiments)Formalized by R. A. Fisher (1935); systematized in social sciences by Harrison & List (2004)
ΤύποςRandomized experiment conducted in a real political settingExperimental design
Θεμελιώδης πηγήGerber, A. S., & Green, D. P. (2000). The Effects of Canvassing, Telephone Calls, and Direct Mail on Voter Turnout: A Field Experiment. American Political Science Review, 94(3), 653–663. DOI ↗Harrison, G. W., & List, J. A. (2004). Field experiments. Journal of Economic Literature, 42(4), 1009–1055. DOI ↗
Εναλλακτικές ονομασίεςPolitical field experiment, Get-out-the-vote experiment, GOTV experiment, Voter mobilization experimentfield trial, natural field experiment, randomized field experiment, field RCT
Συναφείς45
ΣύνοψηA field experiment in political science randomizes a real intervention — such as a get-out-the-vote canvass, mailing, or phone call — among genuine political actors in their natural environment and compares behavioral outcomes like validated turnout. Revived for the discipline by Gerber and Green's 2000 voter-mobilization study and codified in their 2012 textbook, the approach combines the causal leverage of randomization with the realism of consequential, real-world settings, while carefully distinguishing the effect of being assigned a treatment from the effect of actually receiving it.A field experiment applies the logic of a randomized controlled trial in a naturally occurring, real-world environment rather than an artificial laboratory. Participants are randomly assigned to treatment and control conditions while going about everyday activities, allowing researchers to estimate causal effects with high internal validity while preserving a level of ecological realism that laboratory settings cannot offer. The design is especially prominent in economics, public health, political science, and development research.
ScholarGateΣύνολο δεδομένων
  1. v1
  2. 2 Πηγές
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Πηγές
  3. PUBLISHED

Μετάβαση στην αναζήτηση Λήψη διαφανειών

ScholarGateΣύγκριση μεθόδων: Field Experiment in Politics · Field Experiment. Ανακτήθηκε στις 2026-06-25 από https://scholargate.app/el/compare