ScholarGate
Βοηθός

Σύγκριση μεθόδων

Εξετάστε τις επιλεγμένες μεθόδους δίπλα-δίπλα· οι γραμμές που διαφέρουν επισημαίνονται.

Διαδικασία Αίτησης Επιτροπής Δεοντολογίας×Ερευνητικές Δραστηριότητες με Ευάλωτους Πληθυσμούς×
ΠεδίοΕρευνητική ΔεοντολογίαΕρευνητική Δεοντολογία
ΟικογένειαProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Έτος προέλευσης19911979
ΔημιουργόςU.S. Department of Health and Human Services; International research oversight organizationsU.S. Department of Health and Human Services; World Health Organization; International research ethics community
ΤύποςGuidelineGuideline
Θεμελιώδης πηγήU.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2018). Protection of Human Subjects. Code of Federal Regulations Title 45, Part 46, Section 46.109. link ↗U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2018). Protection of Human Subjects. Code of Federal Regulations Title 45, Part 46, Subparts B, C, D. link ↗
Εναλλακτικές ονομασίεςIRB application, REC application, ethics approval, protocol submissionvulnerable subjects, special populations, vulnerable groups, additional protections
Συναφείς55
ΣύνοψηSubmitting a research protocol to an ethics committee (IRB, REC, or equivalent) is a mandatory procedural gateway in human subjects research. The application process requires researchers to document their study design, justify scientific rationale, disclose risks and benefits, provide participant protections (informed consent forms), and address ethical considerations. The submission includes a completed ethics application form, protocol document, consent forms, researcher CVs, and evidence of institutional support. This standardized process enables ethics committees to conduct rigorous, timely, and consistent review before research commences.Vulnerable populations are groups with limited capacity to protect themselves due to age, cognitive ability, institutional dependency, or social circumstances. Regulatory frameworks in the U.S. (45 CFR 46 Subparts B, C, D) and internationally identify specific vulnerable populations—children, prisoners, pregnant women, cognitively impaired individuals—and mandate additional ethical protections beyond standard informed consent. These protections include obtaining informed consent from surrogate decision-makers (parents, guardians), additional assurances of minimal risk, and enhanced monitoring for safety. Research ethics committees apply heightened scrutiny to studies involving vulnerable populations and may deny approval if special protections are inadequate.
ScholarGateΣύνολο δεδομένων
  1. v1
  2. 4 Πηγές
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 4 Πηγές
  3. PUBLISHED

Μετάβαση στην αναζήτηση Λήψη διαφανειών

ScholarGateΣύγκριση μεθόδων: Ethics Committee Application Process · Research with Vulnerable Populations. Ανακτήθηκε στις 2026-06-19 από https://scholargate.app/el/compare