Σύγκριση μεθόδων
Εξετάστε τις επιλεγμένες μεθόδους δίπλα-δίπλα· οι γραμμές που διαφέρουν επισημαίνονται.
| Σχεδιασμός Ίσου Βάρους Πραγματιστικών Μικτών Μεθόδων× | Σχεδιασμός Μικτών Μεθόδων με Πραγματιστική Προσέγγιση× | |
|---|---|---|
| Πεδίο | Ερευνητικός Σχεδιασμός | Ερευνητικός Σχεδιασμός |
| Οικογένεια | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Έτος προέλευσης≠ | 2000s–2010s | Early 2000s (formalised); pragmatism as philosophy late 19th–early 20th century |
| Δημιουργός≠ | Creswell, Plano Clark, Johnson, Onwuegbuzie (mixed methods methodology scholars) | John W. Creswell & Vicki L. Plano Clark (formalised); philosophical grounding in William James, John Dewey, Richard Rorty |
| Τύπος | Mixed methods research design | Mixed methods research design |
| Θεμελιώδης πηγή≠ | Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1483344379 | Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-1483344379 |
| Εναλλακτικές ονομασίες | equal-status pragmatic MMR, QUAL=QUAN pragmatic design, balanced pragmatic mixed methods, equal-priority pragmatic design | pragmatic MMR, pragmatism-guided mixed methods, pragmatic inquiry design, practical mixed methods |
| Συναφείς | 6 | 6 |
| Σύνοψη≠ | Equal-weight pragmatic mixed methods is a research design in which quantitative and qualitative strands are assigned the same methodological priority (QUAL = QUAN) and conducted from a pragmatist philosophical stance. Rather than privileging one paradigm, the researcher selects and combines methods that best answer the research question — treating practical utility as the primary criterion for all design decisions. | Pragmatic mixed methods design is a research approach that selects and combines quantitative and qualitative methods based on what best answers the research question, rather than adhering to a single philosophical paradigm. Rooted in the philosophical tradition of pragmatism — associated with William James, John Dewey, and later Richard Rorty — it treats methodological fit and practical utility as the primary criteria for design decisions. The approach is endorsed by leading mixed methods scholars including Creswell and Plano Clark as the most common philosophical worldview underpinning mixed methods work. |
| ScholarGateΣύνολο δεδομένων ↗ |
|
|