ScholarGate
Βοηθός

Σύγκριση μεθόδων

Εξετάστε τις επιλεγμένες μεθόδους δίπλα-δίπλα· οι γραμμές που διαφέρουν επισημαίνονται.

Δυναμική Αντιστοίχιση Βαθμολογίας Προδιάθεσης×Στάθμιση Βαθμολογίας Προδιάθεσης (PSW / IPW)×
ΠεδίοΑιτιακή ΣυμπερασματολογίαΑιτιακή Συμπερασματολογία
ΟικογένειαRegression modelRegression model
Έτος προέλευσης1986-20101983 (propensity score); 2003 (efficient IPW estimator)
ΔημιουργόςRobins (1986) on sequential treatments; Lechner & Miquel (2010) on dynamic matchingRosenbaum & Rubin (propensity score); Hirano, Imbens & Ridder (efficient weighting)
ΤύποςSequential causal matchingCausal inference / reweighting
Θεμελιώδης πηγήLechner, M., & Miquel, R. (2010). Identification of the effects of dynamic treatments by sequential conditional independence assumptions. Empirical Economics, 39(1), 111-137. DOI ↗Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55. DOI ↗
Εναλλακτικές ονομασίεςdynamic PSM, sequential propensity score matching, longitudinal propensity matching, DPSMPSW, inverse probability weighting, IPW, propensity-based weighting
Συναφείς66
ΣύνοψηDynamic Propensity Score Matching (DPSM) extends classic propensity score matching to settings where treatment is assigned repeatedly over time and earlier treatment choices influence later ones. It estimates the causal effect of entire treatment sequences or regime changes by constructing matched comparisons at each decision point using the full history of covariates and prior treatments.Propensity score weighting is a causal-inference method that reweights observations so that the covariate distributions of treated and untreated units look exchangeable, enabling unbiased estimation of average treatment effects from observational data. Each unit receives a weight that is the inverse of its probability of receiving the treatment it actually received — a strategy formalised by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983) and given its efficient semiparametric form by Hirano, Imbens and Ridder (2003).
ScholarGateΣύνολο δεδομένων
  1. v1
  2. 2 Πηγές
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Πηγές
  3. PUBLISHED

Μετάβαση στην αναζήτηση Λήψη διαφανειών

ScholarGateΣύγκριση μεθόδων: Dynamic Propensity Score Matching · Propensity Score Weighting. Ανακτήθηκε στις 2026-06-18 από https://scholargate.app/el/compare