ScholarGate
Βοηθός

Σύγκριση μεθόδων

Εξετάστε τις επιλεγμένες μεθόδους δίπλα-δίπλα· οι γραμμές που διαφέρουν επισημαίνονται.

Crisis Bargaining Game×Audience Cost Analysis×
ΠεδίοInternational RelationsInternational Relations
ΟικογένειαMCDMMCDM
Έτος προέλευσης19941994
ΔημιουργόςFormalized by James Fearon and others (building on Schelling)James D. Fearon
ΤύποςExtensive-form game of sequential crisis escalationFormal signaling mechanism in crisis bargaining
Θεμελιώδης πηγήFearon, J. D. (1994). Domestic political audiences and the escalation of international disputes. American Political Science Review, 88(3), 577–592. DOI ↗Fearon, J. D. (1994). Domestic political audiences and the escalation of international disputes. American Political Science Review, 88(3), 577–592. DOI ↗
Εναλλακτικές ονομασίεςInternational Crisis Game, Escalation Game, Signaling Game of Crisis Bargaining, Deterrence Crisis GameAudience Costs Theory, Domestic Audience Cost Model, Tying-Hands Signaling, Audience Cost Mechanism
Συναφείς33
ΣύνοψηA crisis bargaining game is a formal, usually extensive-form model in which two states sequentially choose to challenge, escalate, stand firm, or back down during an international dispute, and the analyst solves for the equilibrium pattern of escalation and concession. Building on Schelling's strategy of conflict and given an influential treatment in Fearon's (1994) model of escalation as a war of attrition, these games make explicit how incomplete information about each side's resolve, and the costs each pays for backing down, shape whether a crisis ends in mutual accommodation, capitulation, or war.Audience cost analysis studies how the domestic political punishment a leader expects for publicly backing down from an international threat makes that threat credible. Introduced formally by James Fearon (1994), the mechanism explains why a leader who escalates a crisis in public ties their own hands: retreating would expose them to costs imposed by domestic audiences for looking weak or incompetent. These accumulating audience costs let states signal resolve, and because democracies can generate larger and more reliable audience costs, the concept underpins prominent arguments about regime type, crisis behavior, and the democratic peace.
ScholarGateΣύνολο δεδομένων
  1. v1
  2. 1 Πηγές
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Πηγές
  3. PUBLISHED

Μετάβαση στην αναζήτηση Λήψη διαφανειών

ScholarGateΣύγκριση μεθόδων: Crisis Bargaining Game · Audience Cost Analysis. Ανακτήθηκε στις 2026-06-25 από https://scholargate.app/el/compare