ScholarGate
Βοηθός

Σύγκριση μεθόδων

Εξετάστε τις επιλεγμένες μεθόδους δίπλα-δίπλα· οι γραμμές που διαφέρουν επισημαίνονται.

Εγκυρότητα Δομής (Construct Validity)×Νομολογική Εγκυρότητα×
ΠεδίοΨυχομετρίαΨυχομετρία
ΟικογένειαLatent structureLatent structure
Έτος προέλευσης19551955
ΔημιουργόςLee J. Cronbach & Paul E. MeehlLee J. Cronbach & Paul E. Meehl
ΤύποςValidity evaluation frameworkValidity evidence framework
Θεμελιώδης πηγήCronbach, L. J. & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗
Εναλλακτικές ονομασίεςconstruct validation, factorial validity, nomological validity evidence, validity of interpretationnomological network validity, construct network validity, nomological web validity
Συναφείς66
ΣύνοψηConstruct validity is the degree to which a test or scale actually measures the theoretical construct it is intended to measure. Introduced by Cronbach and Meehl in 1955, it is the central validity concern in psychological and educational measurement, evaluated by accumulating multiple lines of empirical and logical evidence rather than by any single statistical test.Nomological validity evaluates whether a construct behaves as theory predicts within a broader network of related constructs. It is not a single statistical test but an accumulation of evidence that the measure fits coherently into a web of theoretically grounded relationships — demonstrating that what is measured is what the theory says it should measure.
ScholarGateΣύνολο δεδομένων
  1. v1
  2. 2 Πηγές
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Πηγές
  3. PUBLISHED

Μετάβαση στην αναζήτηση Λήψη διαφανειών

ScholarGateΣύγκριση μεθόδων: Construct Validity · Nomological Validity. Ανακτήθηκε στις 2026-06-15 από https://scholargate.app/el/compare