ScholarGate
Βοηθός

Σύγκριση μεθόδων

Εξετάστε τις επιλεγμένες μεθόδους δίπλα-δίπλα· οι γραμμές που διαφέρουν επισημαίνονται.

Μπεϋζιανή Εκ των Υστέρων Σχεδίαση×Αντιστοίχιση Βαθμολογίας Προδιάθεσης×
ΠεδίοΕρευνητικός ΣχεδιασμόςΕρευνητική Στατιστική
ΟικογένειαProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Έτος προέλευσης1964 (Kerlinger ex post facto); Bayesian integration from 1990s–2000s onward1983
ΔημιουργόςFrederick N. Kerlinger (ex post facto framework); Bayesian extension draws on Laplace and modern Bayesian statisticsPaul Rosenbaum and Donald Rubin
ΤύποςQuantitative observational research design with Bayesian inferenceMethod
Θεμελιώδης πηγήKerlinger, F. N. (1973). Foundations of Behavioral Research (2nd ed.). Holt, Rinehart and Winston. link ↗Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. DOI ↗
Εναλλακτικές ονομασίεςBayesian causal-comparative design, Bayesian after-the-fact design, Bayesian observational causal design, Bayesian retrospective causal studyPSM, propensity score weighting, covariate balance
Συναφείς53
ΣύνοψηBayesian ex post facto design investigates possible causal relationships among variables that have already occurred, without researcher manipulation of those variables, and quantifies uncertainty about those relationships using Bayesian statistical inference. The researcher selects groups that differ on an outcome or a presumed cause after the fact, then uses prior knowledge and observed data together — via Bayes' theorem — to estimate credible effect sizes, group differences, or predictors.Propensity score matching (PSM) is a method for reducing confounding bias in observational studies by balancing baseline characteristics between treatment groups, simulating randomization. Developed by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983), it estimates the probability of receiving treatment given observed covariates, then matches or weights treated and control individuals with similar treatment probabilities. Widely used in medicine, epidemiology, and policy evaluation when randomized trials are infeasible or unethical, enabling estimation of treatment effects while controlling for selection bias.
ScholarGateΣύνολο δεδομένων
  1. v1
  2. 2 Πηγές
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Πηγές
  3. PUBLISHED

Μετάβαση στην αναζήτηση Λήψη διαφανειών

ScholarGateΣύγκριση μεθόδων: Bayesian Ex Post Facto Design · Propensity Score Matching. Ανακτήθηκε στις 2026-06-18 από https://scholargate.app/el/compare