ScholarGate
Βοηθός

Σύγκριση μεθόδων

Εξετάστε τις επιλεγμένες μεθόδους δίπλα-δίπλα· οι γραμμές που διαφέρουν επισημαίνονται.

Μοντέλο Κινδύνου Ελέγχου×Αναλυτικές Διαδικασίες στον Έλεγχο×
ΠεδίοΛογιστικήΛογιστική
ΟικογένειαMCDMMCDM
Έτος προέλευσης19831983
ΔημιουργόςAmerican Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA)American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA)
ΤύποςProfessional auditing frameworkAudit procedure methodology
Θεμελιώδης πηγήAmerican Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). (2015). Audit Risk. AU-C Section 200. AICPA Professional Standards. link ↗American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). (2015). Analytical Procedures. AU-C Section 520. AICPA Professional Standards. link ↗
Εναλλακτικές ονομασίεςRisk-Based Audit Planning ModelAnalytical Review, Ratio Analysis, Trend Analysis
Συναφείς44
ΣύνοψηThe Audit Risk Model is a foundational framework developed by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) that structures audit planning by decomposing overall audit risk into three components: inherent risk, control risk, and detection risk. This model guides auditors in allocating resources and designing audit procedures proportionate to the level of risk in each account or assertion.Analytical procedures are evaluations of financial information made by studying plausible relationships among both financial and non-financial data. Rather than testing individual transactions, auditors develop expectations about what numbers should be and compare them to actual results, investigating significant differences. This approach is both required during audit planning and is often more cost-effective than detailed transaction testing.
ScholarGateΣύνολο δεδομένων
  1. v1
  2. 2 Πηγές
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Πηγές
  3. PUBLISHED

Μετάβαση στην αναζήτηση Λήψη διαφανειών

ScholarGateΣύγκριση μεθόδων: Audit Risk Model · Analytical Procedures in Auditing. Ανακτήθηκε στις 2026-06-18 από https://scholargate.app/el/compare