ScholarGate
Βοηθός

Σύγκριση μεθόδων

Εξετάστε τις επιλεγμένες μεθόδους δίπλα-δίπλα· οι γραμμές που διαφέρουν επισημαίνονται.

Αναλυτικές Διαδικασίες στον Έλεγχο×Μοντέλο Κινδύνου Ελέγχου×
ΠεδίοΛογιστικήΛογιστική
ΟικογένειαMCDMMCDM
Έτος προέλευσης19831983
ΔημιουργόςAmerican Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA)American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA)
ΤύποςAudit procedure methodologyProfessional auditing framework
Θεμελιώδης πηγήAmerican Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). (2015). Analytical Procedures. AU-C Section 520. AICPA Professional Standards. link ↗American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). (2015). Audit Risk. AU-C Section 200. AICPA Professional Standards. link ↗
Εναλλακτικές ονομασίεςAnalytical Review, Ratio Analysis, Trend AnalysisRisk-Based Audit Planning Model
Συναφείς44
ΣύνοψηAnalytical procedures are evaluations of financial information made by studying plausible relationships among both financial and non-financial data. Rather than testing individual transactions, auditors develop expectations about what numbers should be and compare them to actual results, investigating significant differences. This approach is both required during audit planning and is often more cost-effective than detailed transaction testing.The Audit Risk Model is a foundational framework developed by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) that structures audit planning by decomposing overall audit risk into three components: inherent risk, control risk, and detection risk. This model guides auditors in allocating resources and designing audit procedures proportionate to the level of risk in each account or assertion.
ScholarGateΣύνολο δεδομένων
  1. v1
  2. 2 Πηγές
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Πηγές
  3. PUBLISHED

Μετάβαση στην αναζήτηση Λήψη διαφανειών

ScholarGateΣύγκριση μεθόδων: Analytical Procedures in Auditing · Audit Risk Model. Ανακτήθηκε στις 2026-06-19 από https://scholargate.app/el/compare