Σύγκριση μεθόδων
Εξετάστε τις επιλεγμένες μεθόδους δίπλα-δίπλα· οι γραμμές που διαφέρουν επισημαίνονται.
| Έρευνα Δράσης× | Ανάλυση Προγράμματος Σπουδών× | |
|---|---|---|
| Πεδίο≠ | Ποιοτική Έρευνα | Μέθοδοι Πεδίου |
| Οικογένεια | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Έτος προέλευσης≠ | 1946 | 1949 (Tyler); 1980s–2000s (Posner's analytic framework) |
| Δημιουργός≠ | Kurt Lewin; expanded by Kemmis, McTaggart, Reason & Bradbury | George J. Posner (systematic framework); Ralph Tyler (foundational rationale) |
| Τύπος≠ | Method | Qualitative / mixed document analysis |
| Θεμελιώδης πηγή≠ | Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2(4), 34–46. DOI ↗ | Posner, G. J. (2004). Analyzing the Curriculum (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill. ISBN: 978-0072823899 |
| Εναλλακτικές ονομασίες≠ | Participatory Action Research, PAR, Collaborative Inquiry | curriculum evaluation, curriculum review, syllabus analysis, curriculum appraisal |
| Συναφείς≠ | 1 | 6 |
| Σύνοψη≠ | Action research is a collaborative research methodology in which researchers work with practitioners and community members to investigate a problem, implement change, and evaluate outcomes, cycling through reflection, action, and learning. Developed by Kurt Lewin (1946), action research bridges research and practice, aiming simultaneously to produce knowledge and practical improvement. | Curriculum analysis is a systematic research method for examining the content, structure, goals, and underlying assumptions of educational curricula — including written syllabi, textbooks, lesson plans, and policy documents. By mapping what is taught, how it is sequenced, and what values are embedded, researchers and educators can evaluate alignment with learning objectives, identify gaps or biases, and guide curriculum reform across all levels of education. |
| ScholarGateΣύνολο δεδομένων ↗ |
|
|