Process / pipelineEducational PsychologyCognitive dispositions and habits of mindPipeline

Critical Thinking Dispositions Scale

Also known as: CTDS, California Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory, CCTDI

OriginatorPeter FacioneYear1992Sources2Related methods7

The Critical Thinking Dispositions Scale (CTDS), exemplified by the California Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory (CCTDI), measures the extent to which individuals exhibit cognitive dispositions conducive to critical thinking. Developed by Facione (1992), it assesses dimensions including truth-seeking, open-mindedness, analytical orientation, self-confidence, systematic approach, and inquisitiveness. Critical thinking dispositions—the habits of mind and values that support rigorous reasoning—are distinct from but complementary to critical thinking skills.

Key highlights

  • Measures constructs beyond skills; recognizes that dispositions are essential to critical thinking
  • Grounded in Delphi expert consensus on critical thinking; aligns with broad educational goals
  • Validated across diverse educational levels and cultural contexts
  • Captures individual differences in intellectual character useful for personalized instruction

Intuition

This section is available to Pro members. Upgrade to Pro

How it works

This section is available to Pro members. Upgrade to Pro

When to use it

The CTDS is used in education to assess critical thinking disposition development, evaluate the effectiveness of curricula designed to foster intellectual character, guide teaching interventions, research relationships between dispositions and academic outcomes, and conduct longitudinal studies of intellectual development across educational programs.

Strengths & limitations

Strengths
  • Measures constructs beyond skills; recognizes that dispositions are essential to critical thinking
  • Grounded in Delphi expert consensus on critical thinking; aligns with broad educational goals
  • Validated across diverse educational levels and cultural contexts
  • Captures individual differences in intellectual character useful for personalized instruction
Limitations
  • Self-report bias: respondents may report idealized dispositions rather than actual behaviors
  • Temporal variability: dispositions may fluctuate with context, task, or recent experiences
  • Cultural considerations: some dimensions (e.g., open-mindedness, truth-seeking) may be culturally interpreted differently

Common pitfalls

This section is available to Pro members. Upgrade to Pro

Applications

This section is available to Pro members. Upgrade to Pro

Frequently asked

Can critical thinking dispositions be taught?

Yes, though not through direct instruction alone. Dispositions develop through modeling by faculty and peers, engagement with challenging problems, feedback on reasoning, exposure to diverse perspectives, and intellectual communities that value questioning and evidence-based thinking. Explicit attention to dispositions in curriculum design accelerates development.

Why would someone have high critical thinking skills but low disposition scores?

Someone might have learned to perform logical analysis or scientific reasoning for grades or credentials (skills) without internalizing a commitment to truth-seeking, open-mindedness, or systematic thinking in their broader worldview (dispositions). This person might use skills strategically but resist conclusions that contradict their preferences.

Are some dispositions more important than others?

All contribute to critical thinking, but in different contexts, certain dispositions become especially important. Truth-seeking is foundational; open-mindedness is crucial in fields involving diverse stakeholders; systematic approach is vital in technical domains. Educational programs can prioritize development of dispositions most relevant to their discipline and mission.

Sources

  1. 1.
    Facione, P. A., Facione, N. C., & Giancarlo, C. A. F. (1992). The California Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory. Insight Assessment, Millbrae, CA.
  2. 2.
    Facione, P. A. (2000). The Disposition Toward Critical Thinking: Its Character, Measurement, and Relationship to Critical Thinking Skill. Informal Logic, 20(1), 61-84.

You have read it. What now?

Cite this page

ScholarGate. (2026, June 3). Critical Thinking Dispositions Scale. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/educational-psychology/critical-thinking-dispositions-scale