Gravity Model of Trade
Also known as: Gravity Equation, Trade Gravity Model, Structural Gravity, Anderson-van Wincoop Model
The gravity model of trade explains bilateral trade flows by analogy to Newton's law of gravitation: trade between two economies is proportional to their economic sizes and inversely related to the trade costs (such as distance) between them. First applied empirically by Jan Tinbergen in 1962 and given a rigorous theoretical foundation by Anderson and van Wincoop in 2003, the structural gravity model shows that trade depends not only on bilateral barriers but on those barriers relative to each country's overall, multilateral resistance to trade.
Key highlights
- Exceptional empirical fit — one of the most stable and replicable relationships in economics.
- Firmly grounded in modern trade theory, so coefficients map to structural parameters and welfare effects.
- Flexible: accommodates many trade-cost determinants and extends to migration, FDI, and other bilateral flows.
- Estimable with fixed effects and PPML using widely available bilateral data, handling zeros and heteroskedasticity cleanly.
Intuition
This section is available to Pro members. Upgrade to Pro
How it works
This section is available to Pro members. Upgrade to Pro
When to use it
Use the gravity model when you want to explain or predict bilateral trade flows and quantify the effect of trade-cost determinants — distance, contiguity, common language, colonial ties, trade agreements, currency unions, borders — on trade. It is the workhorse of empirical international trade and is also applied to migration, FDI, and other bilateral flows. For credible structural interpretation, include exporter and importer fixed effects to control for multilateral resistance, use panel data with pair fixed effects to address endogeneity of policy variables, and estimate by PPML to handle heteroskedasticity and zero trade flows. Naive log-linear gravity without these features yields biased, non-structural estimates and should be avoided for policy analysis.
Strengths & limitations
- Exceptional empirical fit — one of the most stable and replicable relationships in economics.
- Firmly grounded in modern trade theory, so coefficients map to structural parameters and welfare effects.
- Flexible: accommodates many trade-cost determinants and extends to migration, FDI, and other bilateral flows.
- Estimable with fixed effects and PPML using widely available bilateral data, handling zeros and heteroskedasticity cleanly.
- Naive specifications omit multilateral resistance and produce biased estimates of trade-barrier effects.
- Policy variables such as trade agreements are endogenous, requiring panel data with pair fixed effects or instruments for credible causal claims.
- The model describes bilateral flows but is silent about the internal composition (which goods, which firms) without sectoral extension.
- Structural welfare interpretation depends on the assumed elasticity of substitution and the CES demand structure.
Common pitfalls
This section is available to Pro members. Upgrade to Pro
Applications
This section is available to Pro members. Upgrade to Pro
Frequently asked
What is 'multilateral resistance' and why does it matter?
Multilateral resistance is a country's average trade barrier with all of its partners, captured by the outward (Π_i) and inward (P_j) price indices in the structural gravity equation. Trade between two countries depends on their bilateral cost relative to these multilateral terms: a country remote from everyone trades more with any given partner than its bilateral distance alone would suggest. Anderson and van Wincoop showed that omitting these terms — as pre-2003 gravity regressions did — biases the estimated effects of distance and borders, which is why they are now controlled for with exporter and importer fixed effects.
Why estimate gravity by PPML instead of log-linear OLS?
Taking logs of the multiplicative gravity equation and running OLS is biased when the error is heteroskedastic, because by Jensen's inequality the expectation of the log differs from the log of the expectation — so OLS estimates inconsistent elasticities. Log-linear OLS also cannot use observations with zero trade, which are common. Santos Silva and Tenreyro (2006) showed that estimating the equation in its multiplicative form by Poisson pseudo-maximum-likelihood is consistent under heteroskedasticity and naturally includes zero flows, making PPML the standard estimator.
How does the gravity model relate to general-equilibrium trade analysis?
Structural gravity is the partial-equilibrium estimating equation implied by a broad class of trade models (Armington/CES, Eaton-Kortum, Krugman). The estimated trade-cost elasticities and the multilateral resistance system can be embedded in a general-equilibrium framework to run counterfactuals — for example, computing the welfare effects of a new trade agreement — linking the econometrics directly to computable general equilibrium analysis.
Sources
- 1.Anderson, J. E., & van Wincoop, E. (2003). Gravity with gravitas: A solution to the border puzzle. American Economic Review, 93(1), 170–192.
- 2.Santos Silva, J. M. C., & Tenreyro, S. (2006). The log of gravity. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 88(4), 641–658.
You have read it. What now?
Cite this page
ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Gravity Model of Trade. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/economics/gravity-model-trade