Regression modelEconometricsModel

Smooth Transition Autoregressive (STAR) Model

Also known as: smooth transition autoregressive model, LSTAR, ESTAR, logistic STAR, exponential STAR, Yumuşak Geçişli Otoregresif Model (STAR / LSTAR / ESTAR)

OriginatorTeräsvirta (1994); van Dijk, Teräsvirta & Franses (2002)Year1994Sources2Related methods7

The Smooth Transition Autoregressive (STAR) model is a nonlinear time-series model, developed in Teräsvirta's 1994 framework, that lets the dynamics move smoothly rather than abruptly between two regimes. The logistic variant (LSTAR) captures asymmetric business cycles and the exponential variant (ESTAR) captures purchasing-power-parity deviations.

Key highlights

  • Captures smooth, gradual regime changes that a hard threshold model would misrepresent.
  • Offers two interpretable variants: LSTAR for asymmetric dynamics and ESTAR for symmetric mean reversion.
  • Nests linear autoregression as a special case, so nonlinearity can be tested rather than assumed.

Intuition

This section is available to Pro members. Upgrade to Pro

How it works

This section is available to Pro members. Upgrade to Pro

When to use it

Use a STAR model for a continuous time series whose dynamics plausibly differ across regimes and shift gradually rather than abruptly — for instance asymmetric expansions and contractions (LSTAR) or mean-reverting deviations such as PPP gaps (ESTAR). It needs a fairly long series (T greater than 100 is recommended) because the parameter count is high. Before fitting, nonlinearity should be confirmed with an LM-type test (Luukkonen, Saikkonen & Teräsvirta, 1988) and a sensible transition variable must be chosen.

Strengths & limitations

Strengths
  • Captures smooth, gradual regime changes that a hard threshold model would misrepresent.
  • Offers two interpretable variants: LSTAR for asymmetric dynamics and ESTAR for symmetric mean reversion.
  • Nests linear autoregression as a special case, so nonlinearity can be tested rather than assumed.
Limitations
  • Requires a long series (T greater than 100 recommended) because of the high parameter count.
  • Estimation needs grid search or nonlinear least squares for starting values, and convergence can be difficult.
  • Results depend on correctly identifying the transition variable and confirming nonlinearity first.

Common pitfalls

This section is available to Pro members. Upgrade to Pro

Applications

This section is available to Pro members. Upgrade to Pro

Frequently asked

What is the difference between LSTAR and ESTAR?

Both are STAR models that differ only in the transition function. LSTAR uses a logistic function that gives an asymmetric S-shaped switch between two regimes, suited to asymmetric business cycles. ESTAR uses an exponential function that is symmetric around the location c, so the dynamics return to the same outer regime on both sides — well suited to mean-reverting deviations such as PPP gaps.

How is a STAR model different from a threshold (TAR) model?

A threshold model switches abruptly between regimes once the transition variable crosses a threshold. A STAR model replaces that hard switch with a smooth transition function valued between 0 and 1, so the dynamics blend continuously across regimes instead of jumping.

Do I need to test for nonlinearity before fitting?

Yes. Because STAR nests the linear autoregression as a special case, you should first confirm nonlinearity with an LM-type test (Luukkonen, Saikkonen & Teräsvirta, 1988). If the test does not reject linearity, a plain AR model is preferable.

Why is estimation difficult?

The slope γ and location c enter the model nonlinearly and the parameter count is high, so the model is fitted by nonlinear least squares. Good starting values usually require a grid search, and convergence can still be difficult, which is why a long series (T greater than 100) is recommended.

Sources

  1. 1.
    Teräsvirta, T. (1994). Specification, Estimation, and Evaluation of Smooth Transition Autoregressive Models. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 89(425), 208–218.
  2. 2.
    van Dijk, D., Teräsvirta, T. & Franses, P.H. (2002). Smooth Transition Autoregressive Models — A Survey of Recent Developments. Econometric Reviews, 21(1), 1–47.

You have read it. What now?

Cite this page

ScholarGate. (2026, June 1). STAR Model. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/econometrics/star-model