Family Quality of Life Scale
Also known as: Beach Center Family Quality of Life Scale, FQOL Scale, Family Quality of Life Survey, Beach Center FQOL
The Beach Center Family Quality of Life Scale (FQOL) measures quality of life at the level of the family unit rather than the individual, designed especially for families that include a member with a disability. Developed at the University of Kansas Beach Center on Disability by Lesa Hoffman, Janet Marquis, Denise Poston, Jean Ann Summers and Ann Turnbull, and psychometrically evaluated in 2006, the scale asks family members to rate their satisfaction across five domains: family interaction, parenting, emotional well-being, physical and material well-being, and disability-related support. Its central move is treating the family, not the person, as the unit whose quality of life is assessed, reflecting a disability-studies and family-systems view that support and outcomes are collective.
Key highlights
- Measures quality of life at the family-unit level, filling a gap left by individual-focused outcome measures.
- Includes a disability-related support domain that directly captures satisfaction with services families receive.
- Has an established five-factor confirmatory structure with each subscale shown to be unidimensional.
- Can weight satisfaction by importance, accommodating that domains matter differently across families.
Intuition
This section is available to Pro members. Upgrade to Pro
How it works
This section is available to Pro members. Upgrade to Pro
When to use it
Use the FQOL when the outcome of interest is the well-being of the family unit, particularly for families that include a member with a disability, and when you want a multidimensional profile spanning interaction, parenting, emotional and material well-being, and disability support. It suits service evaluation, family-support research, and studies of how disability-related provision affects the whole household. It is less appropriate when the target is an individual's quality of life, when no family member can report on collective domains, or when the population is unrelated to the family-disability context for which the disability-support subscale was designed. Cross-cultural use calls for a validated translation, since the scale has been adapted into many languages.
Strengths & limitations
- Measures quality of life at the family-unit level, filling a gap left by individual-focused outcome measures.
- Includes a disability-related support domain that directly captures satisfaction with services families receive.
- Has an established five-factor confirmatory structure with each subscale shown to be unidimensional.
- Can weight satisfaction by importance, accommodating that domains matter differently across families.
- Relies on subjective satisfaction ratings reported by family members, which are sensitive to expectations and response style.
- The disability-related support subscale showed lower test-retest stability than other domains in the original evaluation.
- A single respondent may not represent the whole family's experience, and members can disagree.
- Validity evidence stems largely from U.S. samples, so other cultural contexts require adaptation and revalidation.
Common pitfalls
This section is available to Pro members. Upgrade to Pro
Applications
This section is available to Pro members. Upgrade to Pro
Frequently asked
Why measure quality of life at the family level instead of the individual level?
Because families that include a disabled member experience disability collectively: support needs affect everyone's time, finances, relationships, and emotions. Individual measures can miss a family under strain or a family thriving despite high needs. The FQOL treats the family as the unit of analysis and reports domains — interaction, parenting, emotional and material well-being, and disability support — that describe the household as a whole, reflecting family-systems and disability-studies views that outcomes are shared rather than individual.
What are the five domains and why is one disability-specific?
The five domains are family interaction, parenting, emotional well-being, physical and material well-being, and disability-related support. The first four apply to any family, giving the scale broad relevance, while the disability-related support domain specifically captures satisfaction with the services and supports the family receives around disability. This makes the FQOL sensitive to whether the service system is meeting the family's needs, which general family measures cannot detect. Hoffman and colleagues confirmed each domain is unidimensional.
How are satisfaction and importance used together?
Respondents rate satisfaction with each domain, and the scale can also collect importance ratings. Weighting satisfaction by importance acknowledges that families differ in what they value: a low satisfaction score in a domain the family considers unimportant means something different from low satisfaction in a domain they prize. Using both lets researchers avoid treating all gaps as equally serious and aligns the measure with how families themselves prioritize aspects of their quality of life.
Sources
- 1.Hoffman, L., Marquis, J., Poston, D., Summers, J. A., & Turnbull, A. (2006). Assessing Family Outcomes: Psychometric Evaluation of the Beach Center Family Quality of Life Scale. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68(4), 1069-1083.
You have read it. What now?
Cite this page
ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Family Quality of Life Scale. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/disability-studies/family-quality-of-life-scale