Coale-Trussell Model
Also known as: Coale-Trussell Fertility Model, M-m Fertility Model, Model Marital Fertility Schedule, Coale-Trussell Doğurganlık Modeli
The Coale-Trussell model is a two-parameter parametric description of the age pattern of marital fertility, introduced by Ansley Coale and James Trussell in 1974. It expresses observed age-specific marital fertility as a standard natural-fertility schedule scaled by an overall level parameter M and modulated by an age-increasing function of deliberate birth-control intensity, summarized by a single control parameter m.
Key highlights
- Summarizes an entire age schedule of marital fertility with just two interpretable parameters, M for level and m for control.
- The control parameter m provides a widely used, comparable indicator of deliberate parity-dependent fertility limitation.
- Estimation reduces to a simple log-linear regression of fertility-to-standard ratios on the control schedule.
- Grounded in empirical natural-fertility patterns, giving the standard a clear demographic interpretation.
Intuition
This section is available to Pro members. Upgrade to Pro
How it works
This section is available to Pro members. Upgrade to Pro
When to use it
Use the Coale-Trussell model to summarize, smooth, or compare the age pattern of marital fertility, and especially to detect and quantify deliberate, parity-dependent fertility control in a population. The control parameter m is a classic indicator used to date the onset of the fertility transition in historical and contemporary populations. The model assumes that departures from natural fertility take the specific age shape encoded in v(a) — that is, control is parity-dependent stopping rather than birth spacing or starting behavior. It is less appropriate where spacing or postponement dominates, where fertility is largely outside marriage, or where the natural-fertility standard poorly represents the population; in such cases relational or more flexible fertility models may fit better.
Strengths & limitations
- Summarizes an entire age schedule of marital fertility with just two interpretable parameters, M for level and m for control.
- The control parameter m provides a widely used, comparable indicator of deliberate parity-dependent fertility limitation.
- Estimation reduces to a simple log-linear regression of fertility-to-standard ratios on the control schedule.
- Grounded in empirical natural-fertility patterns, giving the standard a clear demographic interpretation.
- Assumes control operates through parity-dependent stopping, so it misrepresents populations whose limitation works mainly via birth spacing or postponement.
- Restricted to marital fertility; it does not directly handle the large and rising share of childbearing outside marriage in many modern populations.
- Depends on fixed empirical standards n(a) and v(a) that may not fit every population's true natural pattern.
- Two parameters cannot capture the full diversity of modern fertility schedules shaped by tempo effects and heterogeneous control behaviors.
Common pitfalls
This section is available to Pro members. Upgrade to Pro
Applications
This section is available to Pro members. Upgrade to Pro
Frequently asked
What is the difference between the parameters M and m?
M is a scale parameter: it sets the overall level of marital fertility relative to the natural-fertility standard at the youngest reproductive ages, before deliberate control takes hold. m is the control parameter: it measures how strongly the schedule bends below the natural pattern at older ages, which is the signature of parity-dependent stopping. A population with little control has m near zero and a marital fertility curve that simply tracks a scaled natural standard.
Why is the Hutterite schedule used as the natural-fertility standard?
The Hutterites, an Anabaptist communal group in North America, historically practiced essentially no deliberate fertility limitation and had detailed, high-quality records, making their age-specific marital fertility a clean empirical benchmark for natural fertility. Coale and Trussell anchored the natural standard n(a) on such non-controlling populations so that any downward departure at older ages could be attributed to deliberate control.
Can the model distinguish stopping from spacing behavior?
Not well. The control function v(a) is specifically shaped to capture parity-dependent stopping, where couples cease childbearing after reaching a desired family size. Birth spacing and postponement produce different age signatures that the model can confound with stopping, so a high m should not be read as evidence of stopping alone. Researchers studying spacing typically supplement Coale-Trussell with birth-interval and parity-progression analyses.
Sources
- 1.Coale, A. J., & Trussell, T. J. (1974). Model fertility schedules: variations in the age structure of childbearing in human populations. Population Index, 40(2), 185–258.
- 2.Preston, S. H., Heuveline, P., & Guillot, M. (2001). Demography: Measuring and Modeling Population Processes. Blackwell.ISBN 9781557864512
You have read it. What now?
Cite this page
ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Coale-Trussell Model. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/demography/coale-trussell-model