Method evidence record
Phylogenetic Linguistics
Computational phylogenetic linguistics borrows the statistical machinery developed in evolutionary biology — Bayesian inference, maximum likelihood, and distance-based network methods — and applies it to coded linguistic data, chiefly cognate-judged basic vocabulary, to infer language family trees and estimate when branches diverged. By treating linguistic characters like the molecular characters in a gene alignment and modelling their change probabilistically along a tree, the approach produces classifications with explicit measures of uncertainty and, when calibrated, dated phylogenies. Its best-known applications are the Gray and Atkinson and Bouckaert et al. analyses of Indo-European origins.
Evidence statusSources recorded, not reviewedBibliographic sources are present. Claim-level evidence review has not been performed.
Source record
Recorded
Citations copied verbatim from the method’s source record. No claim-level verification is inferred from them.
Computational Phylogenetic Linguistics
Taxonomic method recordprocess-pipelinelinguistics
Dunn, M. (2014). Language phylogenies. In C. Bowern & B. Evans (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Historical Linguistics (pp. 190–211). Routledge. · ISBN 9780415527897
Open full method3 recorded citations, copied from the method source record.
Curated claims
Assessed
Claims persisted in the evidence ledger, each with its own assessment.
No curated claims yet
This view does not invent a claim assessment when the ledger has none.
Related methods
Suggested4
Generated from the method graph and shown as machine-suggested relations. No evidence claim is inferred.
- Same method familyComparative Method
machine-suggestedRelational suggestion, not evidence.
- Same method familyComparative Method (Historical Linguistics)
machine-suggestedRelational suggestion, not evidence.
- Same method familyGlottochronology (Lexical Dating)
machine-suggestedRelational suggestion, not evidence.
- Same method familyLexicostatistics
machine-suggestedRelational suggestion, not evidence.