ScholarGate
Get started

Method evidence record

Ordinal Content Validity

Ordinal content validity replaces the traditional binary (yes/no) expert relevance judgment with a graded, Likert-type rating scale, allowing richer expert opinion to be captured when evaluating whether scale items adequately represent the intended construct domain.

Evidence statusSources recorded, not reviewedBibliographic sources are present. Claim-level evidence review has not been performed.

Source record

Recorded

Citations copied verbatim from the method’s source record. No claim-level verification is inferred from them.

Ordinal Content Validity Assessment

Taxonomic method recordlatent-structurepsychometrics

  1. Wynd, C. A., Schmidt, B., & Schaefer, M. A. (2003). Two quantitative approaches for estimating content validity. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 25(5), 508–518. · DOI 10.1177/0193945903252998

  2. Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2007). The content validity index: Are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 30(4), 459–467. · DOI 10.1002/nur.20147

Open full method2 recorded citations, copied from the method source record.

Curated claims

Assessed

Claims persisted in the evidence ledger, each with its own assessment.

No curated claims yet

This view does not invent a claim assessment when the ledger has none.

Related methods

Suggested4

Generated from the method graph and shown as machine-suggested relations. No evidence claim is inferred.