Method evidence record
Misinformation Correction Experiment
A misinformation correction experiment tests whether a factual correction can reduce belief in a political misperception. In Nyhan and Reifler's influential 2010 design, all respondents read a misleading claim and a random subset also read a correction, after which their factual beliefs are measured. Their alarming finding was a backfire effect: for some groups, corrections increased rather than decreased misperceptions among those ideologically threatened by the fact. Later large-scale replications by Wood and Porter found backfire to be rare and corrections generally effective, making this design a case study in how political psychology refines a striking result through replication.
Evidence statusSources recorded, not reviewedBibliographic sources are present. Claim-level evidence review has not been performed.
Source record
Recorded
Citations copied verbatim from the method’s source record. No claim-level verification is inferred from them.
Political Misinformation Correction Experiment (Misperception and Backfire Design)
Taxonomic method recordprocess-pipelinepolitical-psychology
Open full method2 recorded citations, copied from the method source record.
Curated claims
Assessed
Claims persisted in the evidence ledger, each with its own assessment.
No curated claims yet
This view does not invent a claim assessment when the ledger has none.
Related methods
Suggested3
Generated from the method graph and shown as machine-suggested relations. No evidence claim is inferred.
- Same method familyElite Cue Experiment
machine-suggestedRelational suggestion, not evidence.
- Same method familyMotivated Reasoning Experiment
machine-suggestedRelational suggestion, not evidence.
- Same method familyPartisan Motivated Reasoning Paradigm
machine-suggestedRelational suggestion, not evidence.