Metodebevisregistrering

Democratic Peace Analysis

Democratic peace analysis is the empirical study of the proposition that democracies rarely or never fight one another. Building on the dyadic research design crystallized by Maoz and Russett (1993), it codes the regime type of each state, constructs dyad-years, and models the probability of militarized conflict as a function of joint democracy alongside controls for power, contiguity, alliances, and trade. The approach has produced one of the most robust empirical regularities in international relations and a long debate over whether shared norms or institutional structures account for it.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Kilderegistrering

Citater kopieret ordret fra metodens kilderegistrering. Ingen påstandsniveauverifikation er udledt heraf.

Empirical Analysis of the Democratic Peace

Taksonomisk metoderegistrering · process-pipeline / international-relations

Maoz, Z., & Russett, B. (1993). Normative and structural causes of democratic peace, 1946–1986. American Political Science Review, 87(3), 624–638. · DOI 10.2307/2938740

Åbn fuld metode

Kuraterede påstande

Påstande gemt i bevis-loggen, hver med sin egen vurdering.

Ingen kuraterede påstande endnu

Denne visning opfinder ikke en påstandsvurdering, når loggen ingen har.

Relaterede metoder

Genereret fra metodegrafen og vist som maskinelt foreslåede relationer — ingen bevispåstand er udledt.

Taxonomic bucketDyadic Conflict Analysismachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyMilitarized Interstate Dispute Analysismachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyPolity Score Analysismachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.