Acceptability Judgment Task
The acceptability judgment task is the modern, quantified successor to informal grammaticality judgments: instead of a single linguist marking a sentence grammatical or not, many participants rate carefully controlled sentences on a graded scale, and the ratings are analyzed statistically. Built on factorial designs with fillers and counterbalancing, and on response formats from Likert scales to magnitude estimation to forced choice, it turns intuition into replicable, gradient data. The approach anchors the experimental-syntax program associated with Jon Sprouse and colleagues, which tests grammatical hypotheses with the same methodological rigor as psycholinguistic experiments.
Registre font
Les citacions es copien textualment del registre font del mètode. No s'infereix cap verificació a nivell de reclam d'elles.
- Sprouse, J., Schütze, C. T., & Almeida, D. (2013). A comparison of informal and formal acceptability judgments using a random sample from Linguistic Inquiry 2001–2010. Lingua, 134, 219–248. · DOI 10.1016/j.lingua.2013.07.002
- Bard, E. G., Robertson, D., & Sorace, A. (1996). Magnitude estimation of linguistic acceptability. Language, 72(1), 32–68. · DOI 10.2307/416793
- Schütze, C. T. (2016). The Empirical Base of Linguistics: Grammaticality Judgments and Linguistic Methodology. Language Science Press. · DOI 10.17169/langsci.b89.100
Reclamacions curades
Les reclamacions s'han persistit al registre de proves, cadascuna amb la seva pròpia avaluació.
Aquesta vista no inventa una avaluació de reclam quan el registre no en té cap.
Mètodes relacionats
Generat a partir del gràfic de mètodes i mostrat com a relacions suggerides per la màquina; no s'infereix cap reclamació d'evidència.