Запис на доказателства за метод

Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology

The Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST 2.0) is a standardized outcome measure that quantifies how satisfied a user is with an assistive device and with the services surrounding it. Developed by Louise Demers, Rhoda Weiss-Lambrou and Bernadette Ska, the refined 2.0 version comprises twelve items split into a device subscale (eight items, such as comfort, safety, and ease of use) and a services subscale (four items, such as service delivery and follow-up), each rated on a five-point satisfaction scale. Distinctively, QUEST also asks users to identify the three items most important to them, anchoring satisfaction in what the user actually values rather than treating all features as equal.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Изходен запис

Цитиранията са копирани дословно от изходния запис на метода. Те не предполагат проверка на ниво твърдение.

Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST 2.0)

Таксономичен запис на метод · latent-structure / disability-studies

Demers, L., Weiss-Lambrou, R., & Ska, B. (2002). The Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST 2.0): An overview and recent progress. Technology and Disability, 14(3), 101-105. · DOI 10.3233/TAD-2002-14304

Отвори пълен метод

Подбрани твърдения

Твърденията са запазени в регистъра на доказателствата, всяко със собствена оценка.

Все още няма подбрани твърдения

Този изглед не измисля оценка на твърдение, когато регистърът няма такава.

Свързани методи

Генерирани от графа на методите и показани като предложени от машината връзки — не се предполага твърдение за доказателство.

Same method familyParticipation and Environment Measuremachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Taxonomic bucketPsychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scalemachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Used in the same domainWheelchair Skills Testmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.